Gelfand v. Horizon Corp. was a legal proceeding that challenged the legality of the dismissal of an employee because of the sale of land through a modelling company. Gelfand, the prosecutor, worked as a real estate agent for Horizon Corporation and sold much of the land to a modeling company, which he founded in collaboration with his wife and two interest owners without the knowledge of the real estate company. Gelfand therefore sold the country to a third party for a profit of US$57,500 and was immediately fired and refused to his commission after his shares surfaced. Gelfand won the case against Horizon Corporation, and the company was allowed to pay Gelfand`s commission for its sales without its sale with the third party, despite Gelfand`s „violation of the obligation to retain. [19] Overseas trade has increased considerably with the expansion of globalization around the world. At the same time, this does not mean that a common global language has developed with it. Due to the need to disclose information on contracts and agreements between companies in many parts of the world, it is necessary to translate all documents into the language of the recipient country. Among the usual types of agreements and contracts that have an essential condition for translation by a translation service with An Agreement, there is one of the following: The use of Compass East Corporation by the Walt Disney World Company, founded in 1964 in Delaware, is an example of a model company created to buy land.
September 30, 1966, Latin-American Development and Management Corporation; Ayefour Corporation (a pun on Interstate 4); Tomahawk Properties, Incorporated; Reedy Creek Ranch, Incorporated; and Bay Lake Properties, Incorporated; All Florida companies have been merged into Compass East Corporation. These companies bought together large land in central Florida, which would later become the Walt Disney World Resort. Modelling companies were created to prevent „ignorant landowners“ from raising the country`s prices by concealing the real plans and the owners of the hectare purchased. [5] While the use of Disney`s modeling business falls within the bounds of the law, the debate over whether the country was obtained fairly is still under discussion.
